JRPGfan said:
The same is true for 0.999999999 though. Why do you have it work for one thing but not another? The proof looks solid enough though, the concept itself is what I have a hard time wrapping my mind around.
Note Im not saying that 0 is the same as 0.0000000 ect 1. Im saying that 0.99999999 will always be missing that 0.00000000 ect 1 part, that keeps it from being a pure 1. |
No, saying that there is an infinite sequence of 9s doesn't require and end. It goes on forever. However to say that there is an infinite sequence of 0s, followed by a 1 doesn't work. There can't be a 1 after the infinite amount of 0s, because that would by definition mean it was a finite amount of 0s.
That said, I can understand why you have a hard time figuring it out. It can be hard to wrap your head around it.