Does Nintendo require VR/AR to remain relevant...?

[oniyide]

Ck1x said:

oniyide said:

sure what they offer is different, BUT to say they are going to be a good secondary, would have to entail their is a PRIMARY and if they are not the primary then wouldnt they be in fact inferior? 

Consoles arent even in the same markey as tablets and phones, im not quite sure why you brought them up to be honest. Im talking strictly home consoles. And for me they could be seen as equal. But as we see the vast majority arent seeing it that way.

Well the Wii was considered a secondary console even by Nintendo, so there's that...

sure they also consider Wii U a secondary console so there's that too.