Auto-censorship and compromising ones freedom of speech and expression in art.

[Teeqoz]

setsunatenshi said:

Teeqoz said:

I said it was off-topic, and that it wasn't 100% relevant to the question about censorship of art. Geez. Now, you didn't answer my questions. Would you mind doing so? Cause I think it's an interesting question(s) to ask.

you're asking if that's porn? a photo of a naked person for me does not fit the criteria of porn but I guess that's a very subjective distinction.

for me to consider something porn it needs to contain a person or people in sexual contact, so from your barebones description, no I wouldn't even consider that porn.

it would seem to me that you're trying to ask something more than this, that's why I wanted some clarification on what the question was more specifically. perhaps then I could answer in a more specific way

You don't consider nude photos as porn? Are they porn if it's in a sexualized pose?

 

Anyway, the specifics aren't that important, so imagine (Well don't *imagine* it...) that same girl filming herself masturbating, and uploading the video to the internet. That has to be considered as porn, right? And because this is ahypothetical underage girl, that means it is child porn. However, no one forced her, no one asked here, and making the video didn't hurt anyone. Yet watching that video would still be illegal. Do you agree that it should be illegal?