By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tbone51 on 26 March 2016
Edit Thread
OneKartVita said:
tbone51 said:

Can we let go of Nintendo pays for MH argument now? Seems like this will go on for years to come while (if) mainline/big spin offs MH stays Nintendo exclusive :/

I dunno, for some reason this feels like an excuse fans use when not getting MH for their system of choice. Its been said for years now :0

Monster hunter was doing incredible on Playstation and then suddenly it jumps ship exclusively to Nintendo.  If they had of kept it going on psv/ps3 the fans would have moved there.  Nintendo didnt want competition from the vita so took the only game that would make it a worthy rival in Japan. 

 

Why didn't it go,  3DS/vita?  Or 3DS/ps3? Instead it went exclusively Nintendo.  I firmly believe capcom put it up to tender and Sony weren't willing to pay the price tag that Nintendo were.  

 

That's not an excuse like you claim,  it's a logical belief. 

Again sounds more like fans making up excuses. Maybe Capcom just made the right move by switching  the series to 3ds. Of course  there could of been an exclusive deal but Clinging  on to that belief for years now is starting to get old and desperate. They put out MH on vita/ps3/wiiu I think 2 years ago (the ones that aren't as big?) so that whole nintendo exclusive has to stop. 

 

Let's just accept that Capcom is choosing 3ds because that's where the money and easy development is at. Putting it on vita/ps4/etc could be a thing, but as of right now it's not. Let's move on and stop port begging the biggest franchise this gen. (I mean biggest port begging game)