Bandorr said:
I got it / get it for games I do not have. Triple a games several years old? I either have them - or don't want them. Hey look at this month - I have all of those games. If I had GWG - this month would be a 100% wash. Need For Speed: Rivals is almost three years old. If you wanted it - why didn't you get it? Do you really want an almost three year game simply because it is triple A? |
Need for Speed was just an example. But even still, I think saying "too old" is making excuses. "Oh, you want a 3 year old game? You can get it for $15. Whoever wants it, has it already".
But when people want a newer game: "you're asking for too much. That game just came out! You really expect them to give it away for free?".
So, basically, we shouldn't get any games, then. Even though that's a major selling point of PS+ (not so much GwG because Xbox owners have been paying for online for over a decade). Unless you see games like Shadow of Mordor or LBP3 coming soon (both about as old as Sunset).
But to answer your question, yes I would want a 3 year old game just because it was AAA. When we've been getting 95% 2D side scrolling games that are damn near the same, just with different stories.....a AAA would be refreshing, no matter how old. It's not a matter of "want" or "you can just go buy it in the bargain bin". IGC promised a mix of games (indie and AAA) and it's been pretty lopsided in the indie direction this whole gen so far. I may not have an XBOne, at the moment, but it's great to see that they're taking some initiative with the showing this month.








