archer9234 said:
That gets a pass. Sony is the anvil that gets in the way. If Spider-Man was owned by Marvel 100%. He would of been in Civil War from the start. Now Ant-Man, if you follow the movie stories. Hank quit prior to the Ant-Man film. So a Ant-Man wouldn't be in Avengers 1. He was looking for someone during Avengers 2. And was trying to block his tech from being persued for almost 20 years. Yeah, this breaks the Avengers comic book starting characters. But the movies did give a internal explination. Janet was dead 20 years before Avengers 1. So she couldn't be in it, for that reason too. Ant-Man's production was never smooth. So obiously the movie had script and other issues. Movies don't stay in limbo for years, for no reason. |
Well that's the thing, Marvel can't make their movies all it can be because of licencing. Heck I find Wolverine would make a better addition in the Avengers than Spider-man since Wolverine and Captain America have a history. For the sake of Civil War story Spider-man is a nice add, but Spidey and Wolverine joined the Avengers late.
Green Lantern is a founding member of Justice League and there's no licencing issues with DC movies, so what's stopping them from doing just doing it right from the start?
