bananaking21 said:
@bolded: thats not how this works lol.
i think publishers are also realizing how unnecessary it is, its just a marketing phrase after all. "exclusive content" it just rings well marketing wise. its usually just a mission or two, and not very good ones either. but its just there to be used as "Y console is the best place to play this game! due to exclusive content!". but i doubt MS or Sony really believe that anybody cares about them or is willing to buy their conole due to these "exclusive content"
i was talking about the bundles with CoD and SW. they did really well, overall software sales and splits wont get effected much by these bundles.
to try elaborate my point more, when you think about Assassins Creed, Call of Duty, Fifa, Grand Theft Auto and Need For Speed. what consoles did you think about? most likely Playstation and Xbox. why? because while these franchise are multiplatform, and release on PC and even some released on Nintendo, its MS and Sony's heavy Marketing push behind these franchises that associate them with their brands. even though not one of these games are exclusive.
now think Minecraft, Just Dance, Diablo, The Sims and Skylanders, and Playstation/Xbox wont be at the back of your mind as much as they did with the earlier bunch of games. because, while these games released on consoles (Diablo 3 and some sims games did). you didnt have any marketing deals making you associate them with consoles as heavily as CoD and Assassins Creed. and that what marketing deals are for. |
"thats not how this works lol."
How does it work then?
Bolded: I hope Sony/MS/Nintendo realise this as well.







