By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KBG29 said:
Aeolus451 said:

No, it's not. The 6 to 10 year console gens benefit everyone from gamers to publishers. The only issue is the weak hardware but that's why gaming pcs are around for those who care about that. If gamers really cared about graphics as a whole, they would just be pc gamers. The big three sure as shit won't do a tiered console hardware because there's no profit in it. The big 3 don't even make a profit til half way through a console gen. 

 Actually, Sony and Microsoft set themselves up to break even or make profit from day one with PS4 and XBO. There are also a good amount of gamers that like consoles but do get dored after 3 or 4 years with the old hardware. By bringing out even a mid cycle power bump they could keep these people putting the money in their pockets instead of poking their head into PC gaming for a year or 2 tell the next console comes.

 

Snipped.

Again. no. That's wrong. They don't break even on day 1. The price of the console covers just the individual console but not the more significant costs like marketing or development of games/hardware.

People don't become bored from the hardware. It's the lack of game support some consoles have in their later years that's the cause of boredom in a gen. Releasing new hardware or upgrading hardware won't fix that. More games being made for that part of the gen would fix it. Releasing more games also puts more money in their pockets because of software sales and at their point everything they're doing turns a profit. Releasing an upgraded console mid-gen is completely asinine for any of the big three because they would lose any profit because of development costs of upgraded HW.