Wyrdness said:
Yeah well you can believe what ever makes you sleep well also notice how you've been unable to dispute the main point that releasing in the middle of the gen has been done before with success as even if I remove the 360 from the equation you have flat out got no response for the Megadrive so either way my point still stands and you're still at square 1. Nothing is certain yet some things have indicators towards them like an NX version of Zelda and making a stance like "oh they can release Mario at launch because they might have MK the same year" is not logic sorry nothing you say can change that that's just making a baseless assumption with the latter part. |
I ignoring Megadrive comparison because we first talked about Xbox 360 not about Megadrive. NX and Megadrive comparison is similar, because Megadrive was released 3 years after NES same like NX will be released 3 years after PS4/X1, but again that was in 3. generation of consoles we are now in 8. generation of consoles so you really can't compare 3. and 8. generations, also NX will be released 3 years after two strong competitors were launched. If Nintendo wants NX have chance to succeed in middle of generation with sucha popularity of PS4, VR arriving, X1 solid sales, NX need to have great marketing, good price point, great launch and 1st year lineup, good support, something new (maybe that unified platform, or some sort of gimmick)....all that combine, Nintendo needs to do whatever is necessary to maximise chances for success of NX in such circumstances, they especially need to that after their worst selling console because they can't afford another faile of that level.
I think that Nintendo will have big title for next holiday season despite 3D Mario and Zelda, I don't see nothing illogical in that. At end, I think 3D Mario and Zelda will be launch titles and that will be great move, I also think Nintendo will have good 1st year support despite they will release 3D Mario and Zelda at launch, you dont think like and thats OK, so I really don't see what you trying to proof.







