| spemanig said: I have enough faith in my skills in deductive reasoning to not have to withold judgement. I have used a touch screen before. I have used a device with haptic feedback before. I know what this tech is. I know how it works. I will never come anywhere close to replacing the sensation or responsiveness of a real button. Dude, I'm starting at it. There is no gap. I'm calling it a controller because it's obviously based off the patant that was specifically for a controler, not a console unit. It's a controller. I don't have insider knowledge. I just have a brain, a lot of research, a big ego, and an even bigger mouth. Stick around. You'll come to understand me soon enough. |
I never said that it would fully replace the sensation. I stated that lol. I don't think gap is the right word, it seemed like it could slide under. Personally I think that this makes sense as a handheld rather than a controller. I thought the patent said it was supplementary? Suggesting it was another device for the console that could take games on the go. Which I thought would logically be a handheld. Rather than a multi-purpose controller. Which it could be, but you can't please everyone with that.
At least you admit that you have an ego and a big mouth :P I can respect that if you state that xD
