Protester punched during Trump rally

[JWeinCom]

fatslob-:O said:

JWeinCom said:

Eh... I'm not sure what your question is asking really.  

Not sure why you assume my preference to disapprove of Drumf won't disappear.  I gave a list of why I disapprove.  Counter those points, and my position will change.  Politics can absolutely be rational.  

Of course, you are under no obligation to convince me of anything.  Unless of course, you want to attack my position.  If you do so, you should have something to back that up.

I've skimmed a few of your posts in the past and it doesn't look like you'll ever budge your position eits it doesn't look like you consider both sides either ... 

No politics can never be rational because it's basis is entirely dependent upon the aggregate sentiments and the heuriher plustical nature makes the results practically nondeterministic or unverifiable ... 

I'll budge my position when I'm wrong.  Which honestly does not happen all that often, because if I'm not confident about something (which is quite often) I keep my mouth shut on the subject.  If your position is founded on solid reasoning and evidence, there is no reason to budge.  

If you're going to accuse me of not considering both sides... when you're not presenting any sort of argument... then that is absolutely irrational.  I've tried my best to listen to you, but you're just not saying anything of value.  If you refuse to back up what you're saying, what you're saying is worthless.

If you don't think it is worth talking to me, then just don't.  But don't initiate a conversation with me,  refuse to give any kind of argument, and then say I'm too stubborn to reason with.  Because that is frankly a dick move.  

If this is what you're going to do, then please do just don't respond to me in this topic, or in any topic in the future.