Horizon Zero Dawn vs No man's Sky

[Aeolus451]

eva01beserk said:

yo_john117 said:

Exactly! Why does an indie developer deserve less money just because of what they are? The amount of content in NMS most certainly deserves the $60 price point. Most AAA games could only dream of having as much content as this game claims to have (trillions of planets to explore and whatnot).

 

As far as sales go, I think both games will be pretty close to each other, just depends on which game is bundled more. If NMS is everything that it appears to be and lives up to hype I could see it take the lead though.

Not saying that they dont, but customers see value in other aspecs of a game. Like story, wich this game has none. Vissuals, wich this game has low. Gameplay, wich this game has shown very little off. There might be tons to do, but nobody has  confirmed that all of it is enjoyable. Personally I canot play a game withoout a story, so for me this is not worth even $10. An indy studio will never satisfy all the categorys and please every gamer, so I can understand people complaining. While I understand some praising the game for cuz it has what they love.

You see indie and you think it's worth less than full retail price. That what it boils down to. We don't know how the story is or how rich it is or how much focus is actually put into it. Then the souls games don't have much story but a lot of people think they are just fine the way they are.