Hiku said:
| Azzanation said:
Not sure what you’re talking about. I am not on here every day because I actually have a life to attend to. And most times I don’t even check my replies due to the amount of useless twisting answers I get.
|
Then you do know what I'm talking about. And you don't have to be on every day to check the blue icon every once in a while that links you directly to a reply.
Whether you're pretending not to see the answers, or actually ignrong to check your own topics after posting them, even when you ask people a question, neither of them are responsible ways to handle a topic you created.
| No you have not yet proven me wrong. I don’t even know who you are and can’t even remember you replying to my posts. |
First of all, you seem very If you can't remember me ever replying to you, and you yourself claim you often don't even check replies, then you can't claim I've never proven you wrong. That's a pretty obvious contradiction you should have seen a mile away.
I've replied to you many times over the years, and I do remember you specifically because you have a tendency of never replying back once someone provides you with facts. And I often see other people saying they have the same experience with you, such as the person you were quoting above.
You've posted things on numerous occasions without fact checking first, and when people correct you with direct links to quotes and facts, you ignore it, and/or pretend you never saw it.
For example, you made a topic where you claimed Microsoft allowed Minecraft: Story Mode on multiple consoles, incinuating that they are more generous with their first party titles than Sony and Nintendo. You stated that your reason for believing this was because Story Mode came out after Microsoft acquired Mojang.
However, when I replied with this quote: "Telltale began negotiations with Mojang in early 2013, and began work on the title shortly thereafter.[4] Stauffer noted that Microsoft's acquisition of Mojang was not a factor in the game's development, as their interaction with Mojang began well before Microsoft's negotiations.[4]" you did as you usually do, and either ignored it or pretended not to see it, and stopped posting in your own thread.
(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minecraft:_Story_Mode)
There you go. You were wrong.
This is not what I think, but a quote from Telltale's head director of creative communications.
| MS own Mojang, they can do what they like with the deal, and the difference is they still allowed it to happen. |
No. There's a thing called the law. A legally binding contract had already been signed and all the rights had been sold to Telltale for this particular game. Microsoft can't interfear, or they're in breach of their contract. That's why contracts exist.
What part of Telltale's statement is hard for you to grasp? The "not a factor" part? Or the "as they..." part? The latter denotes that the reason MS weren't a factor in the game's development was because negotiations for the game began long before MS began negiotiating with Mojang. Not because MS just chose to stay out of it.
And regarding SFV, I posted things stated by Capcom, such as the Senior Product Manager at Capcom, Matt Dahlgren. You saying that you don't see any of Sony's involvements is what's an an assumption.
We're not talking about occasionally ignoring or missing certain posts. That can happen to anyone. But a very common trend from you, and it tends to happen when you get corrected.
The future of Xbox may very well be about taking their games to multiple platforms. For now their focus is their own Windows platforms though.
I'll just keep this to the point. It's nice that you're finally replying though, even if saying that MS can breach a contract is incorrect.
|
You have still not proven me wrong. At what time did MS try to pull the PS4 versions of Minecraft? Breaking a deal will result in a payout in most cases. We are not talking about major politic issues here, it’s just a video game, they could have cancelled the deal and paid the penalty and guess what, they didn’t, and I bet they didn’t care either. MS like sharing there exclusives because (You keep ignoring this point lol) they allowed Minecraft on WiiU and plan on bringing the story mode to WiiU as well…. Woah wait what? After the buyout, MS are still continuing releasing Minecraft games on other platforms? So where in your post are you proving me wrong?
So until you prove my original post wrong, I would stop trying to justify yourself. I have proven you wrong here. My post relates to MS don’t care about sharing there exclusives, hence Minecraft on ALL platforms, Hence the GBA games like Conker and Banjo on a Nintendo handheld. The Twitter about Rare’s Replay coming to WiiU rumour and many others. All your stating is a simply deal that MS went with for the PS4 version of Minecraft which even if the deal didn’t exist, they most likely would have STILL released the game on PS4 and I am basing that fact around the fact they released a WiiU version. So guess what, Deal or no Deal, MS would have (most likely) released Minecraft on PS4 anyway.
Again with the twisting this convo into something more personal. Yes I don’t have every day to check the blue icon, do you? I do occasionally when I’m free and I normally only reply to those that actually make a sensible debate. In this case I am not planning on replying to this debate anymore.
Good day sir.
