By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azuren said:
pastro243 said:

Tyrany in Mexico? Also, I'm certain I didn't say anything about not doing anything about corruption and drugs

Oh, and those fallacies 

Everything is countrolled through money by the drug cartel, who use force when money won't work. People die over this, and many areas are just simply dangerous to live in now. So yeah, tyrany.

And no fallacies. There's a problem, I proposed an idea. Everyone else is so busy dismantling that idea to come up with their own ideas. Bring me a solution that won't end in another drug regime taking over or the current one maintaining its power. Then I'll further discuss this with you. Until then, you're acting no better than an average politician.

Even the wall would be a better solution than invading México lol. I don't know where your notions of politics of mexico come from, but they are an exageration.

 

Oh, and that's not tyrany man, it's a heavily currupted enviorment but I tell you that even institutions from the states have been involved in drug dealing issues. Hell, the crack epidemic was helped by the CIA and that doesn't mean your country is a tyrany and by no means is a justification for any other country to invade and "set things straight". 

 

 

And there is a fallacy when you point out I don't even live there so it's silly that I comment (I did live in USA btw), specially when you show such ignorance in geopolitical terms and international law notions that makes you actually think it's valid or a good idea to take over mexico since "how much they want to move to America anyways"