By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Einsam_Delphin said:

We have every reason to believe that all of them are generic and not a single reason to believe that they aren't. I mean cmon, we don't need to physically see all 721 Pokemon to to be confident in saying all of them will be in Sun & Moon, for example. Even if we ignore the fact that the game is Sticker Star in every other way shape and form, there's the generic toad where Toadsworth should be, the shop is ran by a generic blue toad where the mustachio'd (or atleast a different variety) of toad would be, then a yellow generic toad was seen in a seemingly more important role basically confirming that the only variety is once again palette swaps, and in total we saw atleast 12 toads all lookalikes. If they had any unique toads, we definitely woulda seen one by now, but we haven't, cause they don't have any.

I'll say what I was saying all this time. Patience. If the game is trash, we'll say it. As I said with Sticker Star when I play it. Although everything points to a Sticker Star 2.0, I can't possibly deny that, it's still one minute of a, maybe, 20 hours game (if it's similar in length to SS). There's room for improvement, there are still lots to see of game's footage, and while I'm not precisely hopeful, I prefer to wait to make a final judgement of the game, and not bashing it for a minute trailer. The same goes for Federation Force, and all the games that are being trashed. If they're bad, we'll see it, there's no hurry about jumping to conclusions. You can't possibly tell me that with one minute footage you could know all about the game. One minute could give you a bad impression (I really had a bad impression too), but you can't say all of it will be terribad. And you can't infer for a minute that all the Toads will be look-alike, although it gives that impression. We'll see in the final game. And we'll say that's a shitty decision for that if this is the case.