By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JNK said:

Nope. Zelda Wii U was confirmed several times. The question is, if an NX version really exist. Dont act like its Zelda NX, its not.

SuperMetalDave64 Videos was shut down. He talked about upcoming releases.

 

The Zelda on Wii U confirmation doesn't change what I said. Once they reveal it, the NX version will be touted as the main version, just like with Twilight Princess.

There's really no text based documentation like with his Pokemon leak? What other upcoming releases did he talk about?

 

Gamemaster87 said:

What history? The history that Nintendo consoles have 5-6 years of life cycle? And not 4 as you suggest. The history of Nintendo launching handhelds first? And not the home console as you suggest.

As you can clearly see you're the one who disregards history.

 

The history in the OP, you did read it right? Yes history doesn't always repeat itself, but it's not that they did it before that's important, it's because it made sense to do so then, and it still does now. They're basically examples of what Nintendo would do in that situation. When they've got a new product, they're going focus on it and not spend significant time in the presentation on old product they're not even supporting anymore. As for the history you're talking about, it's not the same situation. They posted losses for the first time, their game development is being strained big time, they have almost 0 third party support, and so ons. They're going against history because keeping the Wii U around longer than they have to makes little sense, and releasing typical successors wont cut it.