MikeRox said:
Thunderbird77 said:
Yet again wrong, it's called reaping what you sow. Third parties sell worse when they don't try. When they do try, they get better sales on nintendo platforms. When they do crappy decisions on ps and xbox, they also get poor sales there, No magic involved.
You can talk about third party support or EA, one doesn't equal the other. Also, it's safer to say sony and ms NEED third parties or else they'd crash, nintendo has been profiting without them for a while. Theyr support helps a console's success but isn't absolutely necessary for staying in the market.
Wii didn't really have much better 3rd party support than anything and calling it casual just screams for me to ignore the statement.
Wii U proved many things but not the ones you talk about.
|
Well they seem to sell well enough on PlayStation and Xbox for them to be happy.
Or if curiosity. What 3rd party multi million selling blockbusters have Nintendo platforms enjoyed that sold better than on PlayStation or Xbox? And we're they similar games to core Nintendo releases?
|
They can be happy all they want, the point here is they're leaving tons of money on the table by not supporting nintendo platforms while nintendo's profits are minimaly affected by the abscence of EA.
Best case I can see is rayman legends, although there are some others. Overall, late ports sold bad on both ps4, x1 and wii u
