By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dunban67 said:
archer9234 said:

Which is why I would like Nintendo to actually test if they just equally objectify (Fan Service) all the characters. Will anyone give a shit then.

That is a question of target audience/demographics not censhorship

This thread is talking about removing Bikini outfits. I don't care if people call it censorship or audience. They removed BIKINI skins, that's the focus.  Because the ONLY real reason they're removed, is because it's objectifying women. Not because of a rating problem. If that was the case. Then Baywatch should be rated M. I'd like to see if being equally "smutty" to both sexes will make people not care, that they're in the game.

Because what argument do you have now? "Women are being Objectified! Oh, wait... the men's bulges are being shown off too." Now it's fair. Would they still get removed, or not? If they still do. Then Baywatch has to be rated M. You can't even use the argument. "Well they're being sexualized!" In swinwear. That anyone, of any age could see on the beach. By that logic. If someone finds a woman hot. She's fully covered up. And showing no skin. But still faps to it. Than all chothing, not matter what, is sexual pleasure. My signature & avatar should be banned on VGchartz, as well. I'm equally showing off Hulk & She-Hulk's bodies.