By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Volterra_90 on 17 February 2016
Edit Thread
outlawauron said:
Pineapple said:

They're different approaches to the Fire Emblem franchise, so it makes perfect sense to review them separately.

If the point of the review is to inform people about whether or not they should buy the game, you can't inform people about whether they should buy conquest by playing Birthright, because you can't really say anything about whether or not the difficulty is too unforgiving for newer players.

If you have to play both to be able to review them, then it makes perfect sense to review them separately.

Different approaches is a very nice way of saying different difficulties. It's two perspectives on the same events.

It'd be like reviewing a Saga or Suikoden several times because there are multiple campaign where you get a different side of the story.

Which means different characters, different relationships between characters, different plot, different POV, different dialogues, and it has like 20 exclusive levels and 50 exclusive characters. It's not just a difficulty adjust. It's obviously a different experience. That's a fact. People can find questionable the decision of split them in two different games and not in the same package, but the experiences are not the same. I'm starting to think that you're just flaming and you don't know what the games are about.