| zero129 said: 1.Where did i say that the isnt gamers who buy a console for exclusives?. 2.Clearly if you are a hardcore gamer (Not fan) and one console has exclusive games on it that you want to play you are going to have no other choice but to buy that console 3.This is consumer negitive unless your the HArdcore Fan of a System, as you are giving no choice in the matter other then to play or not to play. But to play, it means owning an extra system thats costing money that could of been used for other things such as more games. 4.In the past the was a need for exclusives 5.Fact is exclusives only matter to the Hardcore fans of a system and to the makers of them systems. 6.Also yes MS exclusives coming to PC is a good thing and even if they where going to the PS4 that would still be a good thing as then more people get to play why would this be a negitive as long as PS4 games also ended up on xbox in return??. |
1. No, u didnt say this. Also I did not say u said this.
2/3. Yes. It works that way. I see no negatives here - I simply choose the best option. Also, I can buy a second/third/PC console if the makers prove that it is worth it - look at my 360/PS3 part. Did I " lose " money on it ? No. I simply get an acces to where I want to be. If only the makers shows anything interesting , there is a lot that I can do. It's sad to say this, but games nowadays are too repetable to me.
4. No, that was more financial/technical issue if u ask me. If we compare this gen to the previous gens, we see the huge part of games are multiplats what makes choose a little bit easier.
5/6. "All games on one platform " dream looks perfect, but I believe in competition.
I have to say that Xbox One, with Spencer on board looks better and better day after day for me, but now - if they announce a game that drives me crazy - i will rather upgrade my PC than purchase One. It will be cheaper for me, it will runs it better.
