Critics should due everything they can to give an objective criticism of whatever they're reviewing or criticizing. For a gaming example, criticizing a puzzle game for not having an open world isn't a valid criticism. That's the critic's bias stating what they wanted rather than an proper evaluation of the product.
While truly objective is impossible as we're humans, I'd like the journalist to have some semblance of professionalism and separate their bias or personal desires apart from the game itself. Jim Sterling's response to criticism of his horrible FF13 review is exactly the worst kind of response.







