97alexk said:
ReimTime said:
Exactly. Once you know those things, it is almost impossible for most people to view their partner in the same light again. Human nature. So if the best idea is to not ask, how do you know that they were super sexually active back in the day? I mean unless it's blatantly obvious, you have no real idea of whether or not they are a "hoe" (which IMO isn't totally a bad thing if they dedicate themselves to you as your girlfriend). Keep in mind a lot of rumors can be started and blown out of proportion or be downright wrong. And sometimes, hoes can cook some damn good macaroni and cheese and.......
*ahem* anyhow, you get the idea. 
I don't believe in the whole "always a hoe" deal either. I personally know girls who were very sexually active in their teens and college days (which IMO isn't necessarily a bad thing), but really dedicate themselves to one persona they meet, or settle down when they have children. STDs aren't really a problem unless they neglect to tell you about an existing one before having sex.
|
I agree with you. but being sexually active isnt really the bad thing there, its mostly the way they think about it. Like going on a party, getting really really drunk and getting gangbanged isnt my cup of tea when im looking for a life partner lol
|
True, if somebody you are dating goes out to a party and gets blackout drunk and gangbanged, even though they don't owe you much at the dating stage I probably wouldn't pursue that relationship very far lol.
