Aonuma on valuing feedback from Zelda fans

[Pavolink]

Aielyn said:

Pavolink said:
ST and PH wasn't a problem to have SS ready to launch before the actual release date. It was the implementation of Motion Plus. And no, I will never prefer to have an spin off over a real core Zelda game that could have been done after the real game. If you don't have a problem, good, but some of us have and financially it is wrong to have an expensive project running so long and taking many resources.

Are you suggesting that the core Zelda titles haven't been worth the time and money spent on them? Really?

Because if you are, you have lost the right to have Link as your avatar.

No, it's not worth the time. Good games can be done in less time as they were doing in the past in less time. On top of that, the delays are absurd because there's an already long development cycle. 4 years is enough. TP was delayed 1 full year just because they wanted to release on Wii. Is that your value of worth? Even when the game was ready to be released in 2005? Just tell me why it was worth the wait for another full year when they only did for bussiness purposes.

And finally, explain to me how do I win with the delay of SS, a game that could have been released sooner, just because the motion plus implementation, when they could have released SS in 2010 and another one in 2012 reusing assets and implementing motion plus.

I'll sit here to see how do you try to explain to me. Go on.