By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Volterra_90 on 05 February 2016
Edit Thread
MDMAlliance said:
Volterra_90 said:

That's what bothers me. You have to be pretty blind to not see any improvement. There are improvements, that's a fact, and nobody can deny it. I see comments saying "this is shit, they look the same". What the fuck, man, it obviously doesn't look the same! XDD. People might think that the remake could have been better. Of course, I think the same. It could've been better. But it's not bad at all. 

People have been like this with all of the Zelda remakes/remasters.  Saw a lot of it with the Majora's Mask 3D remake (and people had huge issues with the word "remake").  People were saying how they didn't really upgrade at all between Majora's Mask and the 3D remake, which they preferred to call a port. 

I think we should lay the very high standards we have on Zelda U. I love this franchise, and I want to see it evolve and try new things, and I surely won't be forgiving with that game if it doesn't deliver because they promised things that I want to see in that game. TPHD is what it is, a remaster, and I think it's a fairly good one, and that's it. They didn't try to sell us the second coming of Christ or something like that. 

demonfox13 said:
Lmao at anyone trying to defend the frame drop by calling it "artistic choice". Jake and Daxter Remaster on Vita was mediocre, but most other remaster are 1080p and 60fps. NO EXCUSE why a nearly 2 gen ago game struggles with a 30fps. Such a beautiful game deserved at least 60 fps locked.

You might not like it, but it is an artistic choice, and it was an artistic choice since Wind Waker to emphasize the hit. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. And, yeah, some remasters are 1080p and 60 fps, but they barely touch anything besides that. I mean, I'm sure if they only bothered with high res, they could provide us an standard remaster and 60fps would be a given but they tried to rework and make some high res textures from scratch, improved shadows and illumination... so that affects game performance. And I'm still wondering what's so bad about this remaster comparing with others that came this gen for home consoles. Really, I thought the criticisms were fair, and I was the first person who criticized this remaster back then, when it was announced. But I think it's obvious that there was a great improvement on this particular remaster. You must notice that it's harder to bump a 480p game to 1080p than 720p to 1080p. I thought that was a given xDD. 

And, yeah, I was a big critic, and I'm wondering when was the time I become a defender XDDDDD.