By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JNK on 04 February 2016
Edit Thread
elektranine said:
JNK said:

nope. iPhone 6s/iPad pro are way stronger then ps3 already.

The a9x chip from the iPad pro have better benchmark scores then the amd jaguar chip used in the ps4.

The graphical performance is increasing by the factor 2 every year. Bioshock on iPhone is still only iPhone 4s niveau. Looks already way better then wii graphics. Ps3 graphics were reached with iphone 5 or 5s. Now we are coming closer to nextgen graphical level.

 

here is the graphical power of an ipad air:

 

The iPad pro is 2 generations ahead.

Sorry but no you are wrong again. I have facts and not talking points.

 

You do know the difference between a simple rendering demo and a fully interactive video game right? Anybody can create a pretty graphics demo on low end hardware.

 

The A9x chip does not even touch the PS3 much less the PS4. Don't know where you got that bit of 'info' from, don't always trust benchmarks created by Apple's marketing dept.

 

The A9x only has a peak theoretical performance of 460 gigaflops. That theoretical is heavily theoretical. That performance will never ever be seen. It's just marketing, arm is a architecture built for power efficiency not performance. The power consumption controls will quickly kick in and reduce the performance to 30% - 50% at all times. These run on batteries and can't run at the peak performance stated by marketing goons. Add on top of that highly virtualized abstracted OS's like IOS/Android and the average dev will be lucky to get even a fraction of the advertised performance.

 

There are no games for smartphones that even come close to the graphics/AI/scope of games like tlou or others. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/3u5sdc/curious_ipad_pros_benchmark_numbers_vs_xbox_360/

 

the ipad air is able to edit 3 4k video tracks. Thats not "theoretical power". Even Intel i3´s destkops cpus have struggling handling those task.