By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
OneKartVita said:
Wyrdness said:

 

On PS3 the remasters came late in the gen when the was a good flow of new games, people don't mind remasters but it doesn't mean they subsitute for the real reason people bought the platforms for. This industry also has a bad habit of exploiting anything that's a decent idea and turning it into a cheap tactic or irritating practice, we don't want the PS5 to come along and we're getting remasters PS4 games for the first two years, then with the following console remasters for the first 3 years etc...

 

Funny you bring up the ps3.  It's first 2 years it had fuck all new games and fuck all remasters.  This gen PS4 got more new games and more remasters.  You talk like the remasters are at the expense of the new games. You're wrong. 

 

Highlight where I said it's at the expense of new games, I'm pointing out developers are using it as a new means to get lazy, like how we get a number of unfinished games now days which have to be patched up like a war patient. They're throwing out remasters are you're eating it up with the notion "It's a good filler".

PS3 for the first two years off the top of my head had DMC4, Resistance 1 + 2, Dirt, The Darkness, Folklore, Assassin's Creed, LBP, Disgaea 3, Condemened 2, Ratchet and Clank, Motorstorm etc... PS3 still had more new offerings then the current gen only reason it ever struggled was because of the £425 price tag, it was actuall a solid console early on.