Alby_da_Wolf said:
The part inside quotation marks is as MS itself summarizes the "Other" report item. And I can bet too that the accounting is formally perfect and that this is a field where MS wouldn't ever push itself outside the law. About XBox 360, we only know that production costs are lower than XBox 1's, but project and development should have been higher, as XBox 1 was really a modified x86 PC, while the 360 is a real console designed from scratch, with an expressly made PowerPC tri-core CPU, for example, and this alone could have easily cost hundreds of millions, even billions, particularly to pay the foundries' plants and start production. And this seems to be confirmed by 2004 and 2005 reports, when "Other" losses skyrocketed. But unless we are expert accountants, we'll never know precisely. |
Well they did admit R&D was much bigger this time, so we don't need to look for that. Yet that was already a while ago. The general profits for the company already took care of those costs.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








