curl-6 said:
zorg1000 said:
curl-6 said:
The other consoles are targeting the modern mainstream gamer; that is, 12-30 year old males.
Nintendo on the other hand insists on chasing the 1990s ideal of a "family friendly" console with a primarily E-rated library, despite the fact that this is no longer what the mainstream wants in 2016.
They cannot compete head-on with Xbox and Playstation unless they learn from those systems and adapt to today's market.
|
I'm pretty sure Wii U had Call of Duty: Black Ops II/Ghosts, Assassin's Creed III/IV, Madden, FIFA, NBA 2K, Batman: Arkham City/Origins, Darksiders II, Tekken Tag 2, Ninja Gaiden 3, Resident Evil: Revelations, Need for Speed, The Walking Dead, Sniper Elite V2, Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate all in the first year. I don't think lack of games aimed at 12-30 year males was a factor.
|
Those could all be played, usually in a more polished form, on PS3 and 360.
Where was Wii U's exclusive equivalents to Uncharted, The Last of Us, Infamous, Halo, Killzone, Gears of War, Bloodborne...?
|
Now ur changing ur argument, first it was Nintendo was insistent on a "family-friendly" console despite half the lineup being mainstream or M-rated titles, now it's Nintendo didn't develop any M-rated games themselves.
