Can Feminists Get Any More Desperate?

[bdbdbd]

SpokenTruth said:

That's not what I'm talking about.  If I told you someone was attacked, if your first concern was what the person did that got them attacked, then you have a victim blaming mentality. 

I'm nto saying people shouldn't be careful or shouldn't be held accountable for intentionally placing themselves in unwarranted danger. But that doesn't absolve who attacked them. 

My first concern wouldn't be what the person that got attacked did.

If you get attacked and someone says you shouldn't have been there, are you going to say "NO SHIT" or are you going to argue that's where you should have been because you had the right?

In common sense, if you hadn't been with the attacker, you hadn't been assaulted, or if you hadn't been where you were attacked, you hadn't been assaulted. In feminist narrative, this is causal, and if you hadn't been with the attacker, someone else had assaulted you, if you had been somewhere else, you'd been assaulted somewhere else. This is because of a circular argument of where all men are rapists because of this.

It's not like the feminists didn't blame the victim for being assaulted - it's quite the opposite, just depends who's the victim and who the assaulter is - which leads us back to causality argument: as it is causal for some women getting raped and not for some, Gödel would tell us that it has to be because of a quality of the victim. This won't do for obvious reasons, so we could try the statistics, that tells us that unless you're in a wrong place, at a wrong time, with a wrong guy, chances of getting raped are non. But, it won't fit the narrative because not all men would be rapists and getting raped wouldn't be causal.

Some things are out of one's control, and that's what you can do nothing about, but your own actions can help to prevent you from getting yourself to a situation where things get out of control.