By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
bdbdbd said:

I think the issue is, that all the guys know that if you don't want to get in a fight, you stay out of the situations where you're most likely to get in a fight. If you hang out on a station alone and drunk on a friday night past midnight, your risk of getting robbed and beaten is high, compared to being somewhere else or being sober. If you get robbed and beaten, it wasn't your fault, but it was idiotic to go to the station to begin with.

That is the very definition of victim blaming.  Should they be aware of the consequences of their actions?  Absolutely, but being drunk outside after dark isn't a free pass to get mugged. 



There's a big difference in blaming someone for his/her own actions, ie being stupid, and justifying the evildoers actions. There's this thing that my grandmother, and my mother, taught me; just because you can doesn't mean you should. If you climb on a cliff and fall, you're not morally to blame for the fall, but you're to blame for climbing on the cliff. Thing is, that it is real life and in the real life unwanted things happen, and it is you who has to take care for yourself, even if you aren't to blame.





Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.