Sony Trademarks “VRPG” In Japan: Could it Be a Virtual Reality RPG?

[Teeqoz]

kowenicki said:

Teeqoz said:

 

A trademark isn't the same as a patent right? I guess you could trademark the term VRPG, but you can't hinder others in making what would be de facto VRPGs, they just can't call them VRPGs. Does that make any sense?

It isnt the same, but I doubt you could trademark that either.

Its clearly the PG that is the part under consideration anyway.  Sony VR is called Sony VR.  PG is the addition.

Otherwise it would be Sony VRRPG wouldn't it?

 

 

"Virtual Role-Playing Game" works to convey the message, so I don't think it would neccesarily have to be VRRPG. I guess we'll just have to wait and see. What could PG stand for if it is "Virtual Reality PG"? Any ideas?