coolbeans said:
1.) How in the hell do you figure The Amazing Spiderman Reboot was anything "new?" It ripped a boatload of stuff from Raimi's Spiderman film. 2.) I'm kind of confused with what you're suggesting. How can the "newness" of something be considered the connective tissue that harmed someone's acting career + the creator selling his company for billions? "New" shouldn't be the issue, it's how they delivered on said new ideas. |
It probably didn't rip off enough like the former main casts the botched continuity no one wants to delve into and expanding its plot points that nobody asked for.
And you defined TFA as a replica. The fact you have a wild definition for TFA hurts your argument and thinking nostalgia as if it's a bad thing and something that isn't new really gives me nothing but some impressions of a person who is atry hard to be edgy guy who doesn't like what other people like cause reasons...
There's a reason no one's inviting Hayden Christensen and George Lucas to the same war room where the new ones running the business are.
