By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
oniyide said:

 

what of games like AC and the last CODs and the games that werent missing content and still bombed? whose fault is that? Nintendo hasnt tried PERIOD. Thats my point, do you really think they tried? I wouldnt cosnider stuff like Bayo 2 trying thats small stuff, bare minimum

 


Except COD had issues with DLC and the first AC game on Wii U was the horrid AC3 which not only was one of the weaker games in the series it also had perfomance issues on all platforms, again go read the earlier post before you waste my time the userbase on the platform aren't into yearly installments either. Come off the BS Bayonetta 2 is leagues above trying and the type of approach they should be taking, no publisher wanted to fund it and it's the best action title of this gen so don't give no crap about it not counting because I don't care what you consider trying.

The point is simple and if you still don't get it's not my problem and you can move on, why should Nintendo try when the third parties themselves are half assing it? Do you even realize what yopu and some others are saying they should do? You're effectively saying Nintendo should vouch for these wayward third party attempts, that's comical, they'd be far better off going the path of a shared library and second party deals.

Because games like Need for speed: most wanted u, Rayman legends, wonderful 101, lego city undercover, zombiu, and deus ex human revolution actually do try. Not all third party games half ass it. Some put legimate work in and they get burned by not recieving proper support by Nintendo. They all should have received the bayonetta 2 level of support, but they didn't and they all didn't do well. Then Nintendo wonders why they don't have third parties on board