Your definition of Faith is at best, very poor, and appears to be constructed to support your claim.
Faith can be reasonable, or unreasonable, just like everything else in the world.
Faith can be based on evidence, but is lacking irrefutable proof.
Having faith that the world is flat, is unreasonable. The evidence the world is round is irrefutable.
Having faith my wife loves me is reasonable, even in the absence of irrefutable proof of the fact.
Some people say that having Faith in an idea that can not be proven/observed is unreasonable, or silly.
Scientists have Faith in ideas that can not be proven/observed. They are called theories.
Scientific theories are ideas that are supported by evidence. This evidence may, or may not, be accepted by all Scientists.
Many Scientific theories are either never proven, or are disproven.
Despite the fact the Scientific ideas have been disproven countless times throughout ancient and recent times, many people still have 100% Faith in Science. Is that reasonable?
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, always assume you have the upper hand.
NNID = RangerOne
Switch = SW-2393-3671-6907
