Ruler said:
Except for the fact that Fatal Frame 2 actually had sexualized costumes. PS2 had gothic lolita outfits for Mayu and Mio, while Xbox brought up Bikini outfits for the same 15 and 16 years old charcaters. Marie Rose from DoA5 last round for PS4 another KoeiTecmo game has a Bikini outfit and shes 17 years old. Nintendo straight up censored the costumes in Fatal Frame 5 for both Yuri and Miu and dowgraded the boob physics too. Why couldnt they raise the age of Miu to 18? because hey they did it before for both protaginsts In the Fatal Frame 2 Wii remake didnt they? Or why had Yuris costume to be censored too, isnt she 18 allready? And why removing the boob physics for all characters? So many unanswered questions. There are so many ways Nintendo could have handled it better but no they straignt up disrespect Fatal Frame fans and replace them with their own nintendo outfits. Who asked for this? And yes it hurted sales espacially for a lot of people who didnt ended up having a physical copy avaible. And it doesnt matter how much of an impact it had it is just another reason why this series never should be ended up being with Nintendo. |
As a FFrame fan, I don't feel disrespected at all. I'm actually the opposite. I feel like they are not only respecting the series, but the characters and genre in general. Sure, sexy costumes in the game would be nice for some, but it doesn't really make sense here. They could have just kept them in there and treat it as just a game, but I think Ninten wanted to treat the game better than that than to just give players this sort of eye candy reward for completing the game.
Also, Nintendo is not the one holding them down. The dev teams went to them for 4 and 5 to develop the game, as they saw potential in the Wiimote and Gamepad, not the other way around. They could have gone anywhere else, but they chose to go to Nintendo.



![]()
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread







