CaptainExplosion said:
zorg1000 said:
CaptainExplosion said:
zorg1000 said:
|
CaptainExplosion:
Well I don't know, I don't even know what else they have planned for the Wii U.
|
Basically nothing, the fact that 2016 is all outsourced titles, ports & delayed games along with not announcing any significant internally developed titles for 1.5 years shows that Nintendo is gearing up to replace Wii U sooner than later.
|
Which is still a stupid idea. Need I remind you again of the Saturn fiasco? Or how about the transition from the Saturn to the Dreamcast ONLY FOUR YEARS after the Saturn launched?
|
If ur just going to ignore what I said than don't reply to me.
I already gave u 3 examples of devices releasing within 4 years of their predecessor and being successful. Genesis, Nintendo DS, Xbox 360 all released within 4 years of their predecessors and went on to be the most successful devices that Sega, Nintendo, Microsoft have released yet.
Genesis was on the market for 6 years yet Saturn failed, PS2 was on the market for 6 years yet PS3 saw a big drop, Wii was on the market for 6 years yet Wii U failed. It's not the timeframe that's important, it's how the company handles and executes the next device.
|
But how can we be sure Nintendo executes it the right way?
Furthermore, if it comes out in 2016 instead of 2017, the PS5 and fourth Xbox will come out 2 or 3 years later, and the NX will be crushed. >_<
|
We can't be sure, but that's beside the point.
A one year difference in release date isn't going to drastically alter the hardware, whether it releases in 2016 or 2017, PS5/XB4 may or may not crush it. The year it releases is not going to be what decides if it's a success or failure.
