By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
COKTOE said:
Oh, ok. Like I said, I only kind of saw it. I was brushing my teeth at the time it all went down. I don't remember seeing 2 names. So he just reversed the winner and the runner up then?

I just was messing around xD I mean, how much does it take not to screw up by reading a card properly. He just needed to pay more attention.

johnsobas said:
it says 2nd runner up, then 1st runner up, then winner. You are supposed to read 2nd runner up then winner (because if you read 1st runner up you know who won). When he saw the 1st runner up he must have just saw the 1st and assumed it meant 1st place. It's really kind of a stupid way of doing it if you think about it, i can see why he did it it's still bad though.

I think next time they should write the card better to evade mistakes.

Two categories:

Winner

Not Winner



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1