Soundwave said:
It's not a big deal IMO. People these days know their iPhone may not do everything as well as the new iPhone or some of them don't have features (ie: iPhone 5c doesn't have Siri, iPhone 5s does). Steam games don't run on every hardware, the audience base isn't stupid they understand why. The Witcher 4 may not be able to run on the portable NX ... would I rather have the game playable on some of the NX devices (and able to stream to the handheld at least) rather than nothing? I'd rather have the game in that case. As long as the main Nintendo games + Virtual Console are playable on all the devices it's fine IMO. That gives the "cheap" models enough value and content to play.They could ease this moreso by also making the "cheap" console upgradable via a "supplementary" device as they trademarked so that even if you buy the console you have the option of upgrading it if you want say PS5/XB2 ports down the line. You're not "locked out" of content, so long as you're willing to pay a little more, which is fair. The point is NX is NOT a single hardware. You shouldn't be able to point to any one thing and say "that's the NX". A pluralistic take on the hardware is the best thing Nintendo could do. We need new ideas in the industry any way, doing the same thing over and over again just because "well that's how we did it in 1985" isn't working so great for Nintendo as they've basically surrendered their marketshare entirely to Sony and MS. And kids don't like "cheap" either ... that's the other problem here, if cheap is so great then why is the Wii U being ignored by kids? It's the cheapest next-gen console and it has the most cartoony games. Most kids want the "cooler" PS4 or XB1. Same with GameCube, most kids chose a PS2 even though it was more expensive. Cheap is not the be all end all for Nintendo, even the kids/family audience shuns them because they don't have the broad software support and you don't have broad software support without third parties. And you don't have third parties without very good hardware. Wii was a one off fluke that will never be repeated because today, unlike 2006, there are thousands of casual games easily available to casuals 24/7 for free or $1. In 2006, no one was making games for casuals. This isn't a small difference. Smartphones are a bigger aggregator of casual gaming than the Wii brand could ever have dreamed of being. I see more TV commercials these days for casual smartphone games than I do for PS4/XB1/Wii U/3DS games combined. Casuals went from being ignored almost completely by the industry to today where there are more casual games in development than for any other audience. |
I can't decide between you and zorg which one actually has less technical knowledge and which one has less grasp on how video games and video game hardware actually work...
It's so incredibly naive. It literally boils down to "iOS exists. Steam exists. Nintendo can do both og those things. I don't see why not", and just ignoring every single counter argument everyone ever says.
Rinse. Repeat.
Your logic isn't getting any better. The obvious counter arguments remain. This isn't going to happen like you think it is, and if it does, be prepared for Nintendo to get completely and utterly slaughtered. You literally want Nintendo to give up on making actual game consoles and instead make their version of a smart phoen with no phone functionality, and be slaughtered by the likes of Apple and Android like they are now, and/or just go head-to-head against PC gamers, taking a page out of their book, making Nintendo's version of steam on Nintendo's version of the PC. These are two totally horrendous ideas and you keep doubling down and making thesm more and more and more unreasonable, but cannot fathom why its unreasonable no matter what anyone says.
No one should have to explain to you why upgradable hardware is a bad idea.
No one should have to explain to you why having an "NX game" not supported by "all NX hardware" is a bad idea.
No one should have to explain to you why the hardware would be much more expensive as a result of this concept.
No one should have to explain to you why this would be magnitudes more confusing to the average consumer than the Wii U is.
No one would buy this concept. No one besides the few million Nintendo fans that buy all Nintendo hardware regardless. If this is the direction you really want Nintendo to go, you should be pushing them to stop making hardware althogether, and just make iOS/android and PC games. That is the only way Nintendo will make money at either of these concepts. Period.
