By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
OdinHades said:

Which implies games would be always better on PC. You know, like Resident Evil 4, Arkham Knight or Metal Gear Solid 2 - a Hideo Kojima game.

It's just silly to come to any conclusions just now. I don't think the graphics matter that much anyway. Maybe Kojima decided to make an oldschool 2D game? Who knows? Like I said, we'll have to wait and see. There's no point in complaining right away over literally nothing. 



Can I just point out the bolded parts for just a moment. I am aware you chose 3 different games that you no doubt know of the "port" quality of (notice I said port and not made on instead) and used as a counter argument despite the fact that all 3 used different teams, one of which was a console based 12 man dev team and the other two being different teams in general from their originals, the difference there is that you chose bad examples to back up your counterpoint as to why games don't run better on PC (which only suggests you believbe they run better on consoles instead and thus we trek into the muddy waters of us vs them which we really should be staying away from).

I know you don't think visuals don't matter as much, I don't mind for some games but I will definitely praise nice looking visuals when they are presented, despite MGSV being an incomplete and repetitive game it did look the part for a HK game, same with Battlefront despite it's lacking content and Witcher 3 (all 3 AAA's which work really well on PC and the upgrades did show for it in terms of MGSV V as an example).

There isn't much to complain about a game that doesn't exist for sure but TB is taking issue with how the deal will affect said games in the future, I mean really all Kojima has done at the end of the day was to play musical chairs where he goes from one seat to another rather than neither and still doing what he wants, though Sony will give him some assistance, there is no guarantee that Sony will allow him to spread his work to multiple systems and that's where some can start taking issue with and I can see that being a valid complaint. I mean the Mona Lisa is still at it's original place of showing but it's also had multiple copies created that were spread around the world rather than being confided to just the one museum.



The point is that games can run just fine on consoles and I don't see why anyone would skip a game just because it's not coming to their preferred platform. Even when you're a graphics whore, you don't need to limit yourself to PC. Just look at Uncharted 4. I mean, I'm no expert on tech or anything, but what I saw from that game looked better than any game I saw as of late, yes, even on PC. 

About Kojima doing what he wants: I seriously doubt he was forced to do this deal. I think it is exactly what he wants to do and if he wants to do a PS exclusive, you'll just have to respect that. It's not like the guy hasn't any history with PlayStation. Who knows, maybe he was forced to bring MGS5 as a multiplatform? I mean, he did bring MGS4 exclusive to PS3 in a time where Sony was dead last. So that's telling something. I know what he said about multiplatform in 2013, but with what we know about Kojimas Nazi tactics against their own employees, such statements could very well also been forced on him. 

I mean, we simply don't know and we'll most likely never get the whole truth behind it. All I know is that I'm happy to see new games from Kojima and I don't even care too much about the platform. 





Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.