twintail said:
| Goodnightmoon said:
So you even include 2 free to play games in your argument? that says a lot already. And what the hell is wrong with a little digital game like Dr Mario? Please... You even count Project Zelo 5, a tecmo Koei game that people like you have been shitting about because they were not going to release it here, but now that is finally out because fans insisted to have it on the west, now is a proof that they dont care about quality just because metacritics gave it a mixed score, awesome. You are trying too hard.
Their bigs titles this year on WiiU were Splatoon, Mario Maker, Yoshi WW and XCX. And all those games were very good and very polished, to expect that every filler Nintendo puts out becomes a memorable game is simply dumb. Now compare that to the amount of big titles of other companies that fall under expectation over and over and over again, not little games with barely any hype no, big triple AAA games with hype for years becoming mediocre as hell, thats something to worry about, no a few cheap games not being memorable, even on its lowest year Nintendo is still way above others in terms of first party line up.
|
So in summary it is ok for Nintendo to allow garbage to be made because they have a few games that fall under very good, and their poor quality games are not reflective of the company in any single way because of some fine print etc etc.
I will be sure to keep that in mind for the future.
|
No is not ok, but that does not transform Nintendo into a company that doesnt care about quality. Of course they have released some games of intolerable quality this year, and I'm glad those few get the backlash and poor sales they have. But everything I was hyped about this year has been as good as I expected, the "dissapointments" come mostly from secondary fillers annonced months before release, thats not so bad all things consider.
