| spurgeonryan said: There, there is Amiibo Festival in all its disgusting glory! It has an avergae 44 on Meta. Hmm...seems to have the same garbage score that Devils Third has. http://www.metacritic.com/game/wii-u/animal-crossing-amiibo-festival http://www.metacritic.com/game/wii-u/devils-third Mario Tennis Ultra Crap has a score of 59. http://www.metacritic.com/game/wii-u/mario-tennis-ultra-smash So where do you all draw the line on what Nintendo should release and what they should not have released? If you are going to say "Good, I am glad Nintendo only shipped 420 copies of Devils Third because the game is crap", then it would be reasonable to say that you should have been saying this about all their other crap games. But is Amiibo Festival or Mario Tennis actually crap? Controls, visuals, etc. As a game everything is spot on as far as I am told. It is just content and decisions that were made that destroyed these games. On the other side we have an awesomely fun game with Devils Third, that just gets a little choppy and does not have The Last of Us visuals, yet all of you dump on it because why? You are a bully and you can? Perfect Dark had garbage framerate back in the day, absolutely unplayable at times. Skyrim had so many bugs it became the fun thing to do exploiting them. Yet now, just because a game is a bit buggy and not as beautiful as other games you all destroy its image. The game is hella fun! What else do you want with a game? Not everyone on this planet likes to walk for 100's of hours in Xenoblade before anything actually happens. Sure, it is gorgeous and is a nice game, but I can only swim in water for so much and see so many moons before I get bored. Shame on all of you for dissing a game based on a few bugs and PS3 like visuals. Learn to have fun again in stead of just playing games to be elite or to say you played it. DEvils Third does not deserve the shaming you all have given it. Nintendo has plenty of other games that they released personally that suck Donald TRumps dick as he rubs his Man rug against your face type sucky! |
Another example of somebody who looks into the numbers way too much. Have you ever stopped to consider that the Devil's Third and Mario Tennis might have been reviewed by different individuals? Have you ever also thought about the fact that because of what kind of games they are that the expectations for Devil's Third might have been higher. Also, as you said, there's really nothing "wrong" with Mario Tennis in terms of how it looks and plays. It's just a little lacking for a Mario game. Devil's Third on the other hand seems to have actual quality issues.
Also, about Framerate issues on the N64. Perfect Dark's framerate issues (which weren't nearly as bad as a lot of people claim btw) were metioned in reviews back in 2000 but they were considered only a minor problem and were deemed as acceptable because in those days, lots of games had framerate issues. Unlike today, it was nearly unavoidable. It was actually expected that a game like Perfect Dark would have framerate issues. The fact that a console game actually existed where you could have four human players and 8 computer players at the same time was considered somewhat of an achievement back then. Besides, Goldeneye also had framerate issues, as did the Turok games. So most reasonable people were expecting a game like Perfect Dark that was newer and had even more advanced graphics and gameplay ot not have those issues.
Check out my art blog: http://jon-erich-art.blogspot.com
