By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 10 December 2015
Edit Thread
NeverEndingStory said:
DonFerrari said:

Lack of shooters on WiiU play for both sides.

If there was no shooters on WiiU before and there wasn't a huge influx of users then the userbase don't really care that much about shooters. So altough it doesn't have competition from shooters (but have from several good games) it also don't have a formed market on it. So you can nullify this point. It probably is selling more on it's freshness than on lack of competition.


Thats why the game has such a 'childish' style. If it were like COD noone would buy it on WiiU. And yeah these harmless art of a shooter made it available and more interesting for the young gamers and older Nintendo fans. Best decision made for this game.


Quite possibly right. And it's the visual trademark of Nintendo as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."