By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Teeqoz said:
TheWPCTraveler said:

Good.

No more BS 7.8/10 too much water scores, then, right, IGN? The problem with this approach, however, is that you still don't have much proof about this...

He needs to publish proof, preferably on Miiverse where the screenshots are native.


The "too much water" complaint wasn't a BS complaint. For those that actually read that review, you'd see that the complaint was related to the clunkiness of all the water-related mechanics, which was made especially apparent by the abundance of it. Ofcourse, it's much more fun to just mock the review without having read through it. 

 

I'm unsure what you mean by the title Spurge. Are the other scores from reputable sites, but just not perfect, or are the other scores not from reputable sites because the scores aren't perfect.

I read the review, Teeqoz. I was just using an easy-to-understand example. The thing about the review was that it felt too much like it was just going off the pre-release PR and off other Pokemon titles - though that may also be a knock against mainline Pokemon entries in general. That was why it was easy to dismiss the "too much water" content as mere rubbish. The wording also did not help.



 
I WON A BET AGAINST AZUREN! WOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

:3