Goodnightmoon said:
is more fun, that's why. You said that is an opinion, yeah, it is,because otherwise we should be praising games for numbers instead of for what they are meant for. Do you believe that a song is better for putting more instruments? Or a film better for having more special effects? Then why do you thik you can find objectivity on the quality of games going by numbers? SWB can have big maps, milions of polygons and whatever you want, is still not as addictive and fresh as Splatoon. And btw Splatoon actually has a real single campaign. Free. |
Seeing as you're going on about this free stuff in the sake of fairness don't forget to mention the dlc kept behind expensive figurines.
You've brought me off on a tangent now. My original post was just pointing out neither game is heavy on content especially at launch and they were scrutinised for it. Shooters in the west have extremely high standards so that's why the metas are low 70 and low 80.
You brought up which is more fun and to me battlefront is way more. I'm looking for a super realistic star wars multiplayer game I can play and communicate with my friends. There's already been two free maps so I'm very happy so far.
If you are looking for a more basic shooter, targeted at a younger audience then that's your prerogative. I'm not judging you and I can see why you prefer splatoon. But to me battlefront is streets ahead as a shooter.
But I get how you'd enjoy a less serious, family friendly shooter. My equivalent family friendly game this year was rocket league and I enjoyed it for months. You'd love that one!







