By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
Nem said:

Fine. Quote me saying that. You're making stuff up.

I said consumer perception is what matters. Right now, consumer perception on the Wii U isnt very positive. Not the case with those other examples you gave. Thank you very much. Don't come back if you're gonna make stuff up.


"If this is really a new system, they have killed the Wii U about as early as SEGA killed the Saturn. What garantee will cosnumers have that they won't do it yet again once they aren't pleased with NX sales? Its the same exact thing that killed the Dreamcast"

U are clearly saying that replacing Saturn so soon was what killed consumer perception and caused the Dreamcast to fail.


By "as early as" i didnt say X years. I defined it as the ammount of time where consumers arent satisfied with whats on offer. This can vary from 1 year to 2,3,4,5,6, 10,20, etc. years, its irrelevant. It depends on the support that was offered to the system in that time. Whats relevant is wether consumers are satisfied and willing to buy a new system.

A system can be in the market for 10 years with the average of 1 game a year. Will anyone be happy at the end and willing to buy a new system from that manufacturer? They are probably not. Dont try to pass my argument as something as simple as X years = sucess or failure.