MTZehvor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
MTZehvor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
No. They had stated long ago that the PS3 hardware was holding them back. I always thought it was a bold statement, but these guys were considered magicians for putting so much into a linear single player experience. Naughty Dog should be given the benefit of the doubt given their pedigree. Unlike most other franchises Sony and Naughty Dog feel confident in their ability to create new franchises that they can let Uncharted go. The same cannot be said for their competitiors and that includes Square with Crystal Dynamics.
|
I think you're missing the point. The point isn't that more cannot be done with new hardware; it's that it takes time (often 4-5 years) of a console's life cycle before we see any games that are significantly "bigger" than what we had last gen. For example, Fallout 4's world, according to Bethesda, is roughly the same size as Skyrim's. The fact that Skyrim was held back by last gen hardware didn't result in a drastically bigger game when Bethesda's first 8th gen RPG came around; rather, the big jump in size (from New Vegas to Skyrim) came during the same console generation. Generally speaking, the big jumps in content only come when a developer has time to get settled in and used to the hardware.
I have absolutely no idea what the second half of the post is meant to be other than...I guess a jab at Tomb Raider...so I'll leave that to the side.
|
Uncharted 3 came out in 2011......which is four years, plus a next gen console. We aren't getting a sequel to this so what we get is what we get.
The second part just meant that Sony isnt afraid to let go of particular franchises. They are quite fond of making new IP's unlike others. If you've ever listened to Yoshida, he's big on that. Its what makes them different compared to MS, Nintendo, Square and others.
|
Uh huh. Skyrim also came out in 2011, and was four years ahead of Fallout 4. The world size is pretty much the exact same (and honestly, in terms of useable terrain, probably leans towards Skyrim since a large portion of Fallout 4's map is bodies of water).
And I get that that's the main point of your second half, I'm just not sure how it's related to a discussion on whether U4 will be graded more highly than RotTR...at all. Sony and Naughty Dog's attitude towards letting go of a particular franchise has no bearing on review scores, other than perhaps reviewers are less likely to get fatigued of a certain formula. Considering this is the fifth Uncharted game within the last eight years, I seriously doubt that will play into Uncharted's favor going up against a reboot that's on its second installment.
|
The last point was bringing home the fact that this is their last game with Uncharted, period. All we can do is wait and see what they've envisioned gameplay-wise for Uncharted. The review scores will depend on their output, this this level of pressure is nothing new to them. They set the pressure upon themselves which is admirable for any person or company who aspires for greatness.
As for Skyrim, that game cannot be compared to Uncharted. Understandable point, but only in true open world games.
