Revisited: "Nintendo fans are predictable" - Now in compliance with forum rules

[Pavolink]

RolStoppable said:

Pavolink said:

1. You want people to be excited for a Fates story trailer, an already released game in Japan that sells worlwide less than Zelda, for a Yoshi and Xenoblade game that have been showed since January 2013, and again, both series sells less than Zelda?

2. And before you go there, that was E3, not a Nintendo Direct. It was supposed to show us new big games and future support for the console, not games announced since more than 2 years before and that have a trailer in almost every presentation.

3. It's like people expecting to see Super Mario Galaxy and in the end the only thing they saw is Super Mario 3D World. You can't blame them for feeling underwhelmed.

1. I don't want people to be excited. I want people to be more reasonable.

2. You don't believe that yourself. If this E3 had had a Zelda trailer (which isn't a new big game), the reception of the presentation on the whole would have been a lot more positive. Like, "Who really cares that a lot of time was spent on amiibo, Zelda looks fantastic."

3. That's exactly what I am talking about. The presence or lack thereof of a few certain IPs determines whether everything else was either good or bad. - "Nintendo isn't making Super Mario Galaxy 3, I am pissed. This presentation was awful." - But if Super Mario Galaxy 3 had been there, then the presentation would have been good despite the rest of the content being identical between the two scenarios.

Of course that makes the difference. I mean, people like me would have a game to be excited. You can claim it was a "good" show if the content you expect and want is there. Would you said it was a good show if the content showed does not appeal to you, outside of the name of the company?

Talking about sheeps.