My thoughts on "Star Fox Zero's graphics look bad"

[Pavolink]

Areym said:

mZuzek said:

Areym said:
I see you points but it still looks so dated compared to many many MANY others games. The gameplay may be spot on but it's on rail (correct me if wrong) so it can't be that hard to pull off or impressive. I'm not sure what this game (this one specifically, not the franchise itself) has going for it honestly, besides brand name.

Yes, because it's a rail shooter, therefore it's a bad game stuck in the past and has no purpose, since absolutely no one can have fun with that type of game if not for nostalgia. I think the only way to make Star Fox really good today would be to make it a MMO open-world.

Well, I didn't say all that. I payed full price for RE: Umbrella Chronicles and Darkside chronicles and I had a fun time with my brother (despite it being a very meh game overall) I'm just saying rail shooters are not the pinnacle of gameplay variety and ingenuity. Coupled with, in my honest opinion, outdate graphics and life-less scenery, I really do not see what this game brings to the table outside of being an Official Star Fox game. The Wii U has way, way better titles than this and I do not see the hype behind this game.

I do agree an MMO set in this world sounds like a great idea...and a furry's wet dream.

Both RE Chronicles games had good graphics for a Wii game, specially Darkside Chronicles.