Dravenet7 said:
The Legend of Zelda OOT is considered one of the best games of all time. If it had been released today, would it still be considered that? No. Because the standards this generation are different from 2+. NSMBU would not be considered as a family game by standard in this generation unless it had multiplayer. There is a reason a game like Ori and the Blind Forest could not be considered a family game even if the content was catered an audience that encompassed all ages. the factors you present simply and what your reference are nowhere near good enough to gave a valid reason why Splatoon is a family game, when then basis of the game, is as a competitive onliine multiplayer shooter. |
So basically what you are saying is that a family game cannot be a competitive online multiplayer shooter. You have no substance or proof for that though. A game can exist in two categories at once.
Mario Tennis can be a sports game and a family game.
Mass Effect can be an RPG and a TPS game for mature players.
You are putting games into individual segments that they don't belong in.
Can (or should, that can work here as well for the point) Splatoon be played by a 10 year old who wants to paint walls? Yes. Can Splatoon be played by a 33 year old who wants to be rank 1? Yes. Those elements make it a family game.
Can (again, or should) Mass Effect be played by someone who enjoys space RPGs and random sexual encounters? Yes. Should that person be a 10 year old? Let's leave that to the parent's discretion. Those elements make it not a family game.