| sc94597 said: The 6 m/s (or 21.6 kph) estimate I gave is actually less than your measurement of 23.46 kph run speed. So we can discard the 50% faster runspeed I guess. I just never thought of 6 m/s being an average run speed of a human on Earth for long distances. Still using your result of 23.46 kph that gives us 11.7 Km. |
Which is pretty much in-line with the direct line measurement for the 301km/sq overall map size, since the route you need to take on foot is not direct, as a result of the land shape and obstructions along the way.
Additionally they run on landmass only, horizontally, which does not account for the large band of water space on the left and right of the map, which can be accessed before hitting the barrier.







